VDA Audit Scenarios
    intermediate
    Featured

    VDA 6.3 Audit: 4 Real-World Scenarios and How to Handle Them

    Practical guide for VDA 6.3 auditors: handling poor preparation, emotional escalation, unexpected discoveries, and personal attacks.

    January 13, 2025
    12 min read
    By Qualiteh Audit Team

    Why This Matters

    VDA 6.3 audits rarely go exactly as planned. Over hundreds of supplier audits across automotive and industrial sectors, our auditors have encountered situations that no textbook prepares you for. How you handle unexpected situations often determines whether the audit achieves its objective—improving supplier quality—or becomes a confrontational exercise that damages relationships.

    What You'll Learn

    • ✓Handle poor audit preparation proactively
    • ✓De-escalate emotional confrontations professionally
    • ✓Navigate ethical dilemmas with out-of-scope discoveries
    • ✓Respond to personal attacks with evidence-based composure

    Download: VDA 6.3 Audit Preparation Toolkit

    Field-tested checklists, response templates, and finding documentation guides based on our 33 VDA 6.3 audits in 2025. Ready to print and use on your next audit.

    • Pre-Audit Preparation Checklist
    • P2-P7 Phase Verification Matrix
    • Difficult Situation Response Cards
    • Finding Documentation Templates

    Our VDA 6.3 Audit Experience

    These scenarios are drawn from 33 external VDA 6.3 audits conducted across Tier 1 and Tier 2 automotive suppliers in 2025. Each situation reflects real patterns observed across multiple facilities.

    33
    External VDA 6.3 Audits in 2025

    These scenarios are drawn from real audit experiences across automotive Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers, covering electronics, plastics, machining, assembly, and surface treatment processes.

    Supplier Tier Distribution

    Tier 1Tier 205101520
    18 audits
    Tier 1 (54.5%)
    15 audits
    Tier 2 (45.5%)

    Supplier Type Breakdown

    Electronics & Sensors9
    27% of audits
    Plastic Injection Molding8
    24% of audits
    Metal Machining7
    21% of audits
    Assembly & Integration5
    15% of audits
    Surface Treatment4
    13% of audits

    VDA 6.3 Phase Coverage

    P2-P4
    Project Management
    33
    P5
    Supplier Management
    28
    P6
    Production Process
    33
    P7
    Customer Support
    22

    Audit Insights

    12.4
    Avg. findings per audit

    Most Common Findings

    • Missing process FMEA updates
    • Incomplete Control Plan linkage
    • Reaction plan not defined
    • Calibration certificates expired
    • Corrective action tracking gaps

    Why These Scenarios Matter

    VDA 6.3 audits rarely go exactly as planned. Based on our experience across 33 audits in 2025, here are the four most challenging—and most instructive—situations our auditors encountered.

    Electronics & Sensors: 9 audits
    Plastic Injection: 8 audits
    Metal Machining: 7 audits
    +2 more categories

    The Four Scenarios

    1

    Poor Audit Preparation

    Missing or incomplete documentation before audit

    Encountered in 73% of audits
    (24/33 audits)
    High Severity

    The Situation

    The supplier failed to provide required documentation before the VDA 6.3 audit, or provided incomplete documentation (Control Plan, FMEA, Process Flow, etc.).

    Resolution Patterns

    5
    Resolved on-site
    19
    Follow-up needed
    3
    Escalated

    Why It's Problematic

    • ×Audit cannot proceed effectively without baseline documentation
    • ×Time is wasted on-site gathering what should have been prepared
    • ×Indicates potential systemic issues with document control
    • ×Creates adversarial dynamic from the start

    The Impact

    Without preparation, audit quality suffers

    • •Audit findings may be incomplete
    • •Supplier unprepared to answer questions
    • •Historical issues unknown
    • •Wasted travel and time

    Recommended Actions

    1
    Download documentation from PPAP portal
    Don't assume supplier will provide everything. Have your own copies as backup.
    Deliverable: Complete documentation set
    2
    Internal alignment meeting
    Meet with PQE, SQE, and Technology Engineer to gather project-specific context.
    Deliverable: Audit focus areas identified
    3
    Review previous audit history
    Check all findings from previous VDA 6.3 audits and verify status of open corrective actions.
    Deliverable: Historical findings mapped
    4
    Schedule preparatory meeting with supplier
    Hold before the actual audit date. Request answers to potential questions.
    Deliverable: Expectations clarified
    5
    Select the right auditor
    Choose someone with experience in this product type. Product-specific knowledge improves audit quality.
    2

    Emotional Escalation During Audit

    Confrontational behavior from auditee

    Encountered in 21% of audits
    (7/33 audits)
    Medium Severity

    The Situation

    During the VDA 6.3 audit, a representative from the audited organization became visibly upset—breaking a product sample and raising their voice about the "unfair" number of negative findings and perceived poor quality assessment.

    Resolution Patterns

    6
    Resolved on-site
    1
    Follow-up needed
    0
    Escalated

    Why It's Problematic

    • ×Emotional reactions derail objective assessment
    • ×Can escalate to unsafe or unprofessional situations
    • ×Other auditees become uncomfortable or defensive
    • ×Findings may be rejected emotionally rather than addressed

    The Impact

    Understanding the psychology helps manage the situation

    • •Fear of consequences (contract loss, job impact)
    • •Personal pride in work being questioned
    • •Feeling ambushed or set up
    • •Language/cultural gap causing misunderstanding

    Recommended Actions

    1
    Suggest a short break
    "Let's take 15 minutes for coffee." Allows emotions to cool and prevents escalation.
    2
    Escalate appropriately
    Contact superior at the customer company. Explain the current situation factually.
    Deliverable: Agreed de-escalation approach
    3
    Reframe the findings
    "Each finding is an opportunity for improvement. Our goal is to help, not to judge."
    4
    Maintain professional demeanor
    Calm, measured tone throughout. No emotional responses to emotional behavior.

    What NOT to Do

    • ×Argue or become defensive
    • ×Dismiss concerns as "overreaction"
    • ×Continue pushing findings in heated moment
    • ×Threaten or use authority
    • ×Document incident punitively
    3

    Unexpected Discovery Outside Scope

    Unapproved product found during audit

    Encountered in 15% of audits
    (5/33 audits)
    High Severity

    The Situation

    The VDA 6.3 audit of production processes went excellently—zero negative findings. However, during the logistics process review in the supplier's warehouse, the auditor discovered a product being produced at this facility without any customer approval (no PPAP, no release).

    Resolution Patterns

    0
    Resolved on-site
    5
    Follow-up needed
    5
    Escalated

    Why It's Problematic

    • ×Unapproved product is a serious compliance issue
    • ×But it's outside the current audit scope
    • ×Reporting could damage relationship
    • ×Not reporting could create liability
    • ×Classic ethical dilemma for auditors

    The Impact

    Finding something outside scope doesn't mean ignoring it

    • •Potential quality/safety risk
    • •Ethical issue if ignored
    • •May not be within audit authority
    • •Could create tension if reported incorrectly

    Recommended Actions

    1
    Recognize scope boundaries
    The unapproved product is NOT part of the current VDA 6.3 revision. You cannot add findings outside defined scope.
    2
    Contact your superiors
    Inform the company that hired you for the audit. Ask for guidance on how to proceed.
    Deliverable: Escalation decision from management
    3
    Avoid immediate escalation
    Never create tension without full facts. The situation may have explanation (different customer, internal project, etc.).
    4
    Organize alignment meeting
    Bring together: your company, audited organization. Present facts without accusation.
    Deliverable: Clear Action Plan together
    5
    Maintain professionalism
    Calm, factual communication. No emotional reactions. Focus on resolution, not blame.
    4

    Personal Attacks: "Turning It Personal"

    Attempts to discredit auditor objectivity

    Encountered in 18% of audits
    (6/33 audits)
    Medium Severity

    The Situation

    At the final closing meeting of a VDA 6.3 audit with many negative findings, the audited supplier organization attempts to discredit the auditor personally: "The auditor was subjective towards our company from the beginning!" "These findings are biased—you had an agenda."

    Resolution Patterns

    6
    Resolved on-site
    0
    Follow-up needed
    0
    Escalated

    Why It's Problematic

    • ×Deflects from actual findings to auditor credibility
    • ×Puts auditor on defensive
    • ×Can influence customer perception
    • ×May undermine legitimate findings
    • ×Classic manipulation tactic

    The Impact

    This is a deflection strategy

    • •"You're biased" = "I don't want to accept these findings"
    • •"Subjective from the start" = "I'm looking for ways to invalidate results"
    • •"Other auditors don't find this" = "I want you to doubt yourself"
    • •"This is personal" = "If I make it about you, it's not about us"

    Recommended Actions

    1
    Return to the standard
    When personal attacks start, pivot immediately to VDA 6.3 requirements. "Let me walk through each finding against the standard."
    2
    Present findings objectively
    For each finding, show: What the VDA 6.3 standard requires, what customer-specific requirements apply, what was observed (evidence), why it's a gap.
    3
    Avoid communication traps
    Don't defend your character or expertise. Don't compare to other auditors. Don't engage with personal accusations.
    4
    Maintain professional composure
    Calm, measured responses. No emotional engagement with attacks. Take a break if needed.

    Response Templates

    When accused of bias
    "I understand this is difficult feedback. Let me show you exactly how each finding relates to VDA 6.3 requirement [X.X]. Here's what the standard requires, and here's what we observed."
    When compared to other auditors
    "Different auditors may focus on different areas. Today's findings are based on the current VDA 6.3 standard and your customer's specific requirements. Let's review each one."
    When asked to reduce findings
    "Every finding documented today is evidence-based. I'm happy to discuss any specific finding you believe is incorrect, with reference to the standard."

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Need Expert Guidance?

    Our team can help you apply these concepts to your specific situation. Schedule a consultation to discuss your quality challenges.

    Schedule a Consultation

    Related Content

    Case Study
    PPAP Quality Turnaround: From 142 Issues to 5
    Case Study
    Supplier Development: Transforming Final Inspection in 10 Days